|
Our Services : Consulting
As
noted above, we also offer consulting services in knowledge and
innovation management, especially in connection with the use
of our own methodology (the PSM method). In general, our consulting
services fall into the following major areas:
.
|
- |
Knowledge
Processing Assessments:
A good starting point in any attempt to improve the rate or quality
of learning and innovation in a firm is to baseline its current
knowledge processing environment. This generally takes the form
of characterizing its current organizational learning behaviors,
as well as the policies and programs that lie behind them. Evaluations
can then made in which current performance is measured against
potential performance -- using our own reference models as a
benchmark -- along with identification of the kinds of interventions
required to get there from here. |
|
- |
Knowledge
Management Assessments:
Whereas knowledge processing assessments focus on organizational
learning and knowledge production and integration issues, knowledge
management assessments focus, instead, on the KM function as
a management discipline within the organization. Organizations
interested in improving their internal KM function can take advantage
of this offering by subjecting their KM groups to our analysis.
Here, we rely on our 'KM Framework,' which provides a blueprint
for KM in terms of its relationship to enhancing knowledge processing,
and the kinds of interventions and tools available to practitioners. |
|
- |
Knowledge
Strategies: We
also offer assistance in the development of strategic plans for
knowledge processing and KM. Here, we rely on the use of our
own methodology (the PSM method). For clients who are not interested
in licensing our method, but who believe in its value, this is
a good alternative to adopting the method for independent, internal
use. It is also an effective way to experiment with, and test
the value of, the Macroinnovation Method without actually going
through the formal licensing process. |
|
- |
Targeted
Interventions:
On the implementation side of our work, we offer assistance to
clients interested in taking transformative steps towards achieving
high-performance knowledge processing, or Enterprise-wide
Innovation in several areas. Specific interventions of this
sort can be classified in terms of the eight dimensions of our
methodology:
. |
|
|
|

|
Ethodiversity: Interventions here are aimed at managing
the diversity of values or worldviews held collectively by an
organization. This typically involves working with the HR function
on recruiting, hiring, and retention issues, as well as the use
of specialized tools to measure the degree of ethodiversity
in a firm. |
|
|
|
|

|
Connectedness: Interventions here are aimed at improving
the flow of information in a firm, usually through technology
or social systems. Here, our goal has less to do with forcing
the flow of information than it does with ensuring that the technological
and social means to do so are adequately in place. Infrastructures,
technological and social ones, as well as the presence of opportunities
for employees to use them, are of primary interest to us in this
area. |
|
|
|
|

|
Community
Formation: Interventions
here are aimed at launching policies and programs that serve
to invite and support the formation of communities of practice,
interest, learning, etc. This may be carried out in connection
with the development of a broader strategy for communities
of practice. |
|
|
|
|

|
Individual
Learning: Interventions
here are aimed at determining the extent to which individuals
are free to engage in learning agendas of their own choosing.
This typically involves the development of related policies and
supporting programs, often in conjunction with the HR function. |
|
|
|
|

|
Group
Learning: Similar to
interventions aimed at individual learning, this area focuses
on groups and communities as venues for learning, along with
the development of related policies and programs. |
|
|
|
|

|
Knowledge
Production: This is
a complex and enormously important area. Here, interventions
are aimed at defining the organizational processes according
to which management knowledge is formulated, evaluated, and adopted
for practice. Of particular interest is definition of the roles
that individuals and groups will play in the process, while preserving
management's sole authority to make decisions. Outcomes in this
area have a significant impact on the degree of openness in a
firm, sometimes also referred to as 'transparency.' |
|
|
|

|
Knowledge
Sharing: Interventions
here are aimed at the manner in which knowledge is disseminated
by managers to a work force following the Knowledge Production
process. In addition, practices related to distributed knowledge
sharing between individuals and groups, as well as between all
of them and management, are also of interest in this area. The
key issue here is Knowledge Integration, and the policies
and programs that make it possible and effective.
.....A new and exciting practice of interest
in this area is the emergence of what we call 'Free Employee
Presses,' or FEPs. FEPs are employee-owned and managed publications
that provide outlets for employees' perspectives on management
decisions and strategies in ways that make the employee point
of view open and accessible to all who wish to have it. In
sum, we can assist with the development and implementation of
FEPs. |
|
|
|

|
Knowledge
Entitlement: Interventions
here are aimed at developing new and progressive means of sharing
the credit and economic rewards of innovations with employees,
particularly with respect to patents, or business innovations
of any other kind. In most firms, intellectual property (IP)
is held exclusively by the employer, but this need not always
be the case. Sharing entitlements to IP with employees can be
a significant motivator for innovation, the results of which
can easily outweigh tradeoffs in the value of IP held exclusively
by the employer. |
.
|
|
 |
|